Review




Structured Review

Novoprotein cap 1 capping system
Cap 1 Capping System, supplied by Novoprotein, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cap+1+capping+system/pm42045224-198-8-12?v=Novoprotein
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cap 1 capping system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

86
Cellscript Inc scriptcap cap 1 capping system
Scriptcap Cap 1 Capping System, supplied by Cellscript Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cap+1+capping+system/pm42286357-315-6-11?v=Cellscript+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
scriptcap cap 1 capping system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Cellscript Inc scriptcaptm cap 1 capping system kit
Scriptcaptm Cap 1 Capping System Kit, supplied by Cellscript Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cap+1+capping+system/pm42128178-58-7-13?v=Cellscript+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
scriptcaptm cap 1 capping system kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Novoprotein cap 1 capping system
Cap 1 Capping System, supplied by Novoprotein, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cap+1+capping+system/pm42045224-198-8-12?v=Novoprotein
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cap 1 capping system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Starck Inc cap 1
Cap 1, supplied by Starck Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cap+1+capping+system/pm41875587-106-11-14?v=Starck+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cap 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Hzymes Biotechnology Co Ltd cap1 capping kit
Cap1 Capping Kit, supplied by Hzymes Biotechnology Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cap+1+capping+system/pmc13010154-114-12-15?v=Hzymes+Biotechnology+Co+Ltd
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cap1 capping kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech cap h2
a. Western blot showing AID depletions of condensin I subunit <t>CAP-H</t> and condensin II subunit <t>CAP-H2,</t> in HCT116 cells synchronized at prometaphase. b. Flow cytometry gating to sort cells at G1 phase and S phase. c. Flow cytometry gating to validate cell synchronization at prometaphase by nocodazole treatment, and at the G2/M checkpoint by RO-3306 treatment before drug release into early prophase. d. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of extracted genomic DNA from human cells with or without gamma irradiation treatment. Extracted gDNA were treated with nuclease S1 to convert single-stranded DNA breaks into double-stranded DNA breaks before PFGE analysis.
Cap H2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cap+1+capping+system/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__26__714539-252-28-29?v=Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cap h2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech antibody against cap h
a. Western blot showing AID depletions of condensin I <t>subunit</t> <t>CAP-H</t> and condensin II subunit CAP-H2, in HCT116 cells synchronized at prometaphase. b. Flow cytometry gating to sort cells at G1 phase and S phase. c. Flow cytometry gating to validate cell synchronization at prometaphase by nocodazole treatment, and at the G2/M checkpoint by RO-3306 treatment before drug release into early prophase. d. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of extracted genomic DNA from human cells with or without gamma irradiation treatment. Extracted gDNA were treated with nuclease S1 to convert single-stranded DNA breaks into double-stranded DNA breaks before PFGE analysis.
Antibody Against Cap H, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cap+1+capping+system/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__26__714539-252-20-23?v=Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody against cap h - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Cellscript Inc scriptcaptm cap 1 capping system
a. Western blot showing AID depletions of condensin I <t>subunit</t> <t>CAP-H</t> and condensin II subunit CAP-H2, in HCT116 cells synchronized at prometaphase. b. Flow cytometry gating to sort cells at G1 phase and S phase. c. Flow cytometry gating to validate cell synchronization at prometaphase by nocodazole treatment, and at the G2/M checkpoint by RO-3306 treatment before drug release into early prophase. d. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of extracted genomic DNA from human cells with or without gamma irradiation treatment. Extracted gDNA were treated with nuclease S1 to convert single-stranded DNA breaks into double-stranded DNA breaks before PFGE analysis.
Scriptcaptm Cap 1 Capping System, supplied by Cellscript Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cap+1+capping+system/pmc13172340-310-6-11?v=Cellscript+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
scriptcaptm cap 1 capping system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a. Western blot showing AID depletions of condensin I subunit CAP-H and condensin II subunit CAP-H2, in HCT116 cells synchronized at prometaphase. b. Flow cytometry gating to sort cells at G1 phase and S phase. c. Flow cytometry gating to validate cell synchronization at prometaphase by nocodazole treatment, and at the G2/M checkpoint by RO-3306 treatment before drug release into early prophase. d. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of extracted genomic DNA from human cells with or without gamma irradiation treatment. Extracted gDNA were treated with nuclease S1 to convert single-stranded DNA breaks into double-stranded DNA breaks before PFGE analysis.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Genome-wide DNA supercoiling arises from transcription and SMC activity and mediates transcriptional negative feedback

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.26.714539

Figure Lengend Snippet: a. Western blot showing AID depletions of condensin I subunit CAP-H and condensin II subunit CAP-H2, in HCT116 cells synchronized at prometaphase. b. Flow cytometry gating to sort cells at G1 phase and S phase. c. Flow cytometry gating to validate cell synchronization at prometaphase by nocodazole treatment, and at the G2/M checkpoint by RO-3306 treatment before drug release into early prophase. d. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of extracted genomic DNA from human cells with or without gamma irradiation treatment. Extracted gDNA were treated with nuclease S1 to convert single-stranded DNA breaks into double-stranded DNA breaks before PFGE analysis.

Article Snippet: LF-PVDF membranes were then blocked by 5% nonfat milk for 1 h and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody against CAP-H (Proteintech, 11515-1-AP, 1:1000 dilution) or CAP-H2 (Proteintech, 26172-1-AP, 1:1000 dilution).

Techniques: Western Blot, Flow Cytometry, Pulsed-Field Gel, Electrophoresis, Irradiation

a. Example regions of genome-wide supercoiling distribution in prometaphase cells under conditions of untreated, condensin I subunit CAP-H AID depletion, and condensin II subunit CAP-H2 AID depletion (left). Changes in genome-wide supercoiling under condensin AID depletion conditions. Dotted lines indicate general reduction in supercoiling levels. Bin size: 100 kb (right). b. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells and GM12878 cells. ATMP density is determined by the ratio between pull-down ATMP-adducted DNA and input DNA, and compared between living cells with DNA breaks (IR: gamma Irradiation) and with intact genome (No IR). Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). c. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells at different cell-cycle stages. ATMP density is determined by the ratio between pull-down ATMP-adducted DNA and input DNA, and compared between living cells with DNA breaks (IR: gamma Irradiation) and with intact genomic DNA (No IR). Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). d. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells at prometaphase, under conditions of untreated, condensin I AID depletion, and condensin II AID depletion. Significance was calculated by one-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). e. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells at prometaphase, with and without gamma irradiation, under conditions of untreated, condensin I AID depletion, and condensin II AID depletion. Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). f. Average supercoiling level across the genome in asynchronous HCT116 cells, with and without gamma irradiation, under conditions of untreated, condensin I AID depletion, and condensin II AID depletion. Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Genome-wide DNA supercoiling arises from transcription and SMC activity and mediates transcriptional negative feedback

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.26.714539

Figure Lengend Snippet: a. Example regions of genome-wide supercoiling distribution in prometaphase cells under conditions of untreated, condensin I subunit CAP-H AID depletion, and condensin II subunit CAP-H2 AID depletion (left). Changes in genome-wide supercoiling under condensin AID depletion conditions. Dotted lines indicate general reduction in supercoiling levels. Bin size: 100 kb (right). b. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells and GM12878 cells. ATMP density is determined by the ratio between pull-down ATMP-adducted DNA and input DNA, and compared between living cells with DNA breaks (IR: gamma Irradiation) and with intact genome (No IR). Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). c. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells at different cell-cycle stages. ATMP density is determined by the ratio between pull-down ATMP-adducted DNA and input DNA, and compared between living cells with DNA breaks (IR: gamma Irradiation) and with intact genomic DNA (No IR). Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). d. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells at prometaphase, under conditions of untreated, condensin I AID depletion, and condensin II AID depletion. Significance was calculated by one-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). e. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells at prometaphase, with and without gamma irradiation, under conditions of untreated, condensin I AID depletion, and condensin II AID depletion. Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). f. Average supercoiling level across the genome in asynchronous HCT116 cells, with and without gamma irradiation, under conditions of untreated, condensin I AID depletion, and condensin II AID depletion. Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

Article Snippet: LF-PVDF membranes were then blocked by 5% nonfat milk for 1 h and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody against CAP-H (Proteintech, 11515-1-AP, 1:1000 dilution) or CAP-H2 (Proteintech, 26172-1-AP, 1:1000 dilution).

Techniques: Genome Wide, Irradiation

a. Western blot showing AID depletions of condensin I subunit CAP-H and condensin II subunit CAP-H2, in HCT116 cells synchronized at prometaphase. b. Flow cytometry gating to sort cells at G1 phase and S phase. c. Flow cytometry gating to validate cell synchronization at prometaphase by nocodazole treatment, and at the G2/M checkpoint by RO-3306 treatment before drug release into early prophase. d. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of extracted genomic DNA from human cells with or without gamma irradiation treatment. Extracted gDNA were treated with nuclease S1 to convert single-stranded DNA breaks into double-stranded DNA breaks before PFGE analysis.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Genome-wide DNA supercoiling arises from transcription and SMC activity and mediates transcriptional negative feedback

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.26.714539

Figure Lengend Snippet: a. Western blot showing AID depletions of condensin I subunit CAP-H and condensin II subunit CAP-H2, in HCT116 cells synchronized at prometaphase. b. Flow cytometry gating to sort cells at G1 phase and S phase. c. Flow cytometry gating to validate cell synchronization at prometaphase by nocodazole treatment, and at the G2/M checkpoint by RO-3306 treatment before drug release into early prophase. d. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of extracted genomic DNA from human cells with or without gamma irradiation treatment. Extracted gDNA were treated with nuclease S1 to convert single-stranded DNA breaks into double-stranded DNA breaks before PFGE analysis.

Article Snippet: LF-PVDF membranes were then blocked by 5% nonfat milk for 1 h and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody against CAP-H (Proteintech, 11515-1-AP, 1:1000 dilution) or CAP-H2 (Proteintech, 26172-1-AP, 1:1000 dilution).

Techniques: Western Blot, Flow Cytometry, Pulsed-Field Gel, Electrophoresis, Irradiation

a. Example regions of genome-wide supercoiling distribution in prometaphase cells under conditions of untreated, condensin I subunit CAP-H AID depletion, and condensin II subunit CAP-H2 AID depletion (left). Changes in genome-wide supercoiling under condensin AID depletion conditions. Dotted lines indicate general reduction in supercoiling levels. Bin size: 100 kb (right). b. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells and GM12878 cells. ATMP density is determined by the ratio between pull-down ATMP-adducted DNA and input DNA, and compared between living cells with DNA breaks (IR: gamma Irradiation) and with intact genome (No IR). Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). c. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells at different cell-cycle stages. ATMP density is determined by the ratio between pull-down ATMP-adducted DNA and input DNA, and compared between living cells with DNA breaks (IR: gamma Irradiation) and with intact genomic DNA (No IR). Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). d. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells at prometaphase, under conditions of untreated, condensin I AID depletion, and condensin II AID depletion. Significance was calculated by one-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). e. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells at prometaphase, with and without gamma irradiation, under conditions of untreated, condensin I AID depletion, and condensin II AID depletion. Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). f. Average supercoiling level across the genome in asynchronous HCT116 cells, with and without gamma irradiation, under conditions of untreated, condensin I AID depletion, and condensin II AID depletion. Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Genome-wide DNA supercoiling arises from transcription and SMC activity and mediates transcriptional negative feedback

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.26.714539

Figure Lengend Snippet: a. Example regions of genome-wide supercoiling distribution in prometaphase cells under conditions of untreated, condensin I subunit CAP-H AID depletion, and condensin II subunit CAP-H2 AID depletion (left). Changes in genome-wide supercoiling under condensin AID depletion conditions. Dotted lines indicate general reduction in supercoiling levels. Bin size: 100 kb (right). b. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells and GM12878 cells. ATMP density is determined by the ratio between pull-down ATMP-adducted DNA and input DNA, and compared between living cells with DNA breaks (IR: gamma Irradiation) and with intact genome (No IR). Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). c. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells at different cell-cycle stages. ATMP density is determined by the ratio between pull-down ATMP-adducted DNA and input DNA, and compared between living cells with DNA breaks (IR: gamma Irradiation) and with intact genomic DNA (No IR). Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). d. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells at prometaphase, under conditions of untreated, condensin I AID depletion, and condensin II AID depletion. Significance was calculated by one-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). e. Average supercoiling level across the genome in HCT116 cells at prometaphase, with and without gamma irradiation, under conditions of untreated, condensin I AID depletion, and condensin II AID depletion. Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). f. Average supercoiling level across the genome in asynchronous HCT116 cells, with and without gamma irradiation, under conditions of untreated, condensin I AID depletion, and condensin II AID depletion. Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA analysis based on two replicates per condition (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

Article Snippet: LF-PVDF membranes were then blocked by 5% nonfat milk for 1 h and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody against CAP-H (Proteintech, 11515-1-AP, 1:1000 dilution) or CAP-H2 (Proteintech, 26172-1-AP, 1:1000 dilution).

Techniques: Genome Wide, Irradiation